How Long Should Your Pandemic Preps Last? Answers vary.
Interesting day, today. I had a letter to the editor published in the News and Observer newspaper. They even added a nice graphic -- an egg-shaped earth wearing a surgical mask.
One problem: The editor of the Letters to the Editor page added a few words in parentheses that changes the meaning of my entire message and makes it look as if I wrote the words! Very frustrating.
I wrote, "According to a May 27 article in The N&O, North Carolina state government is requesting that all citizens stock food, water and medication..."
The editor added these words in parentheses that I put in italics and bold here: "According to a May 27 article in The N&O, North Carolina state government is requesting that [at the first sign of a pandemic in the state] all citizens stock food, water and medication..."
I also stated that Michael Osterholm, infectious disease expert, told Oprah Winfrey in January that we all need to prepare NOW so that our food and medication lasts five to six weeks and that in a News & Observer article about North Carolina preparedness, our state government recommends two weeks.
My point was that experts believe a pandemic flu will arrive in multiple waves, with each wave lasting two to three months, it is logical to prepare for a period lasting as long as six months or more because the pandemic may arrive in waves. But the parenthetical addition wrecks defeats me whole message.
I never said "at the fist sign of a pandemic in the state." That's FAR TOO LATE by that time. Anyone who has ever expected a dusting of snow in a Southern state knows that all the food and milk on store shelves are GONE very quickly. And that's a dusting of snow, not even a snowstorm!
Imagine what will happen when the headline says that the first person in North America has died of an easily transmittable human virus that mutated from the bird flu virus?
To confirm the state’s stance, I called the North Carolina state government and spoke with Chrissy Simeonsson, an epidimiologist in communicable diseases in the Division of Public Health.
Chrissy said there is no "good science" involved in the recommendation of two weeks or any length of time. She says that until the pandemic happens, there is no way to tell if it will be a mild or severe pandemic, or if there will be any pandemic at all. She said that speaking for herself, a two-week supply of emergency preparations would be the minimum. She personally does not know when a good time to start to prepare would be, but (personally) agrees that “at the first sign a pandemic hits the state” would be too late.
Until recently, the federal government refused to list a specific time for which you should prepare. (See my earlier post.) However, as Ms. Simeonsson alerted me today, the federal government finally stated a time period -- two weeks. See: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/planguide/checklist.html
I called the newspaper and as of mid-afternoon, I have heard no response.
Why can't the government and the media make sense of this and present it in such a way that citizens can be effectively prepared?
One problem: The editor of the Letters to the Editor page added a few words in parentheses that changes the meaning of my entire message and makes it look as if I wrote the words! Very frustrating.
I wrote, "According to a May 27 article in The N&O, North Carolina state government is requesting that all citizens stock food, water and medication..."
The editor added these words in parentheses that I put in italics and bold here: "According to a May 27 article in The N&O, North Carolina state government is requesting that [at the first sign of a pandemic in the state] all citizens stock food, water and medication..."
I also stated that Michael Osterholm, infectious disease expert, told Oprah Winfrey in January that we all need to prepare NOW so that our food and medication lasts five to six weeks and that in a News & Observer article about North Carolina preparedness, our state government recommends two weeks.
My point was that experts believe a pandemic flu will arrive in multiple waves, with each wave lasting two to three months, it is logical to prepare for a period lasting as long as six months or more because the pandemic may arrive in waves. But the parenthetical addition wrecks defeats me whole message.
I never said "at the fist sign of a pandemic in the state." That's FAR TOO LATE by that time. Anyone who has ever expected a dusting of snow in a Southern state knows that all the food and milk on store shelves are GONE very quickly. And that's a dusting of snow, not even a snowstorm!
Imagine what will happen when the headline says that the first person in North America has died of an easily transmittable human virus that mutated from the bird flu virus?
To confirm the state’s stance, I called the North Carolina state government and spoke with Chrissy Simeonsson, an epidimiologist in communicable diseases in the Division of Public Health.
Chrissy said there is no "good science" involved in the recommendation of two weeks or any length of time. She says that until the pandemic happens, there is no way to tell if it will be a mild or severe pandemic, or if there will be any pandemic at all. She said that speaking for herself, a two-week supply of emergency preparations would be the minimum. She personally does not know when a good time to start to prepare would be, but (personally) agrees that “at the first sign a pandemic hits the state” would be too late.
Until recently, the federal government refused to list a specific time for which you should prepare. (See my earlier post.) However, as Ms. Simeonsson alerted me today, the federal government finally stated a time period -- two weeks. See: http://www.pandemicflu.gov/planguide/checklist.html
I called the newspaper and as of mid-afternoon, I have heard no response.
The reality is this:
- The U.S. (specifically, its citizens) continue to be woefully unprepared for any pandemic.
- The media isn’t doing enough to spread the word, or more important, to question government policies on pandemic preparation.
- The media is not questioning why the state government is saying to "prepare when pandemic hits the state" and why the federal government is saying, "You can prepare for an influenza pandemic now."
Why can't the government and the media make sense of this and present it in such a way that citizens can be effectively prepared?